Question;

Please be sure to read and understand the instructions provided, follow the outline provided by the client.

My Philosophy Paper  In this course we examined  in an critical and open minded way issues Concerning:

1)the nature of knowledge,

2) free will,

3) personal identity

4) the relation between mind and body

5) the existence of God

, and

6) morality.

In this paper you will write a five (minimum) to seven (maximum) page paper that:

Clearly states your position on at least THREE of the issues that we have covered.

Clearly presents your main reason and/or argument for holding your each of Your possessions

States what you take to be the major argument against or objection to each of your positions

Shows how your positions are consistent with each other and identifies any points of inconsistency in your views.

Before starting, you may find it helpful to review and reflect on the readings and

homework relevant to this project. I will assume that you have both read and

understood (but not necessarily agreed with) the main ideas in the assigned readings.

You may refer to philosophers when developing your views, but check to make sure you

accurately represent their positions. Your assignment will be graded on:

1) accuracy,

2) clarity and organization of your writing

3) coherence/consistency,

4) completeness, and

5) originality.

Avoid plagiarism at all costs. For more information on plagiarism see:

https://www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets/plagiarism.shtmlor

https://www.csub.edu/ssric-trd/howto/plagiarism.htm

In stating your position it might be helpful to identify the philosophical position that is

closest to your own and explain in what ways, if any, your view differs.

Your may organize your paper anyway you like just so long as you address each of the three areas listed above.

Some sample outlines are provided below

Sample Outline One:

PART ONE: God

1.

First Issue: Does God Exist?

a.Statement of the issue and what is at stake in the issue

b.Definitions of God

c.My definition of God

2.My position on the Issue

.a.Statement of my position and definition of key terms

b.Is my view supported by rational arguments and evidence?

c.The role of faith in my view

3.The main argument against or problem with my position

PART TWO: Personal Identity

4.Second Issue: The Personal Identity Problem

a.Statement of the issue and what is at stake in the issue

b.Definitions of key terms

5.My position on the Personal Identity

a.Main reasons why I support this view and definition of key terms

6.The main argument against or problem with my position

7.How my position on the Personal  Identity Problem is related to and consistent with my position on the existence of God.

8.Possible Inconsistencies

PART THREE: FREE WILL

9.Third Issue: Free Will and Determinism

a.Statementof the issue and what is at stake in the issue

b.Definitions of key terms

10.My position on the issue of Free Will and Determinism

a.Main reasons why I support this view and definition of key terms

11.The main argument against or problem with my position

12.How my position on the Free Will issue is related to and consistent with my

position on the existence of God.

13.How my position on the Free Will issue is related to and consistent with my position on Personal  Identity Problem

14.Possible Inconsistencies

Sample Outline Two:

PART ONE:

PERSONAL IDENTITY

1.First Issue: The Personal Identity  Problem

a.Statement of the issue and what is at stake in the issue

b.Definitions of key terms

2.My position on the Personal Identity

a.Main reasons why I support this view and definition of key terms

3.The main argument against or problem with my position

PART TWO: FREE WILL

4.Second Issue: Free Will and Determinism

a.Statement of the issue and what is at stake in the issue

b.Definitions of key terms

5.My position on the issue of Free Will and Determinism

a.Main reasons why I support this view and definition of key terms

6.The main argument against or problem with my position

PART THREE: GOD

7.Third Issue: Does God Exist?

a.Statement of the issue and what is at stake in the issue

b.Definitions of God

c.My definition of God

8.My position in the Issue

a.Statement of my position and definition of key terms

b.Is my view supported by rational arguments and evidence?

c.The role of faith in my view

9.The main argument against or problem with my position

PART FOUR: CONSISTENCY

10.How my position on the Personal  Identity Problem is related to and consistent with my position on Free Will.

11.How my position on the Personal Identity Problem is related to and consistent with my position the existence of God.

12.How my position on the Free Will issue is related to and consistent with my position on the existence of God.

13.Possible Inconsistencies in my views

Answer;

PART 1: God

Many philosophers and scientists have come up with various explanations and ideas with a main aim of proving that God exists. Most of the explanations are subjects of debate and are not considered as accurate arguments. It is very difficult to prove the existence of God. There will always be a contradiction between religion and knowledge or science for instance on Gods existence. Most religious groups do not encourage the argument on the existence of God. They believe that His existence is beyond human explanation. Even though proving Gods existence is difficult, I think those who believe in God should not be judged, as it is a personal decision to do so (Bruce, & Barbone, 2011).

Many descriptions and arguments about God and His existence are available. It is hard to pick one and consider it the most convincing. There is a dilemma on what to and what not to believe. There has been no any convincing answer to “does God exist?” It has always been on the discretion of any individual to choose their direction on the matter according to their knowledge and beliefs.

There are many definitions of God according to individual perspective and different groups. According to (Bruce, & Barbone, 2011) God is defined as sovereign the creator of everything on earth and there is no one beside Him. He is infinite and we as human beings are a result of His works.

In my understanding, God is a supernatural being, all knowing and He is able to perform anything beyond human experience. All things that human beings experience and eyes see is according to His plans and work, He is the maker of heaven and earth.

My position on the existence on the existence of God is neutral. Let those who believe God exists believe so and those who believe in Gods non-existence continue doing so because there is no any convincing argument that explains whether God exists or not. No one can prove God exists or not. This has been a subject of argument for decades and there is no any indication that it is concluding. Each person has his or her explanation on the existence of God.

My position is rational and can be subjected to debate. However, it is evident of the many various religious groups within the society who stand by their beliefs so supporting or being against Gods existence could be best placed if it were a personal responsibility. Faith plays a bigger part in my opinion as the largest part of the world population is divided into faith based groups. There are Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and many others who believe in their God thus the acceptability on the existence of God will depend on the individual groups. It has been difficult to prove Gods existence thus, everyone will stick to their particular stand and they will be guided with a given notion or perception. There is no one given idea that is accepted globally hence we should give every position a chance.

PART 2: Personal Identity

There is a big question to answer on what personal identity covers. Personal identity entails finding answers to questions about human existence; life and death. There are many theories explaining this including the psychological and the physiological views. Theories on personal identity will have implications for instance they may side with or discourage procedures such as euthanasia or they could prove wrong or right religious and faith beliefs such as life after death. Personal identity is concerned with the task of proving whether entities like human beings exist. Personal identity in philosophical perspective tries to answer the question “who am I?” Personal identity try to give an account on the persistence environment and conditions where creatures like us exist.

I advocate for psychological approach of personal identity which sticks to the principle of psychological continuity or the personal persistence. This concerns a person’s private life and constitutes a person’s desires, experiences, and personal characteristics. I support Psychological Approach with a view that a normal human being will always be associated with a non organism which is conscious and is able to think. It is logical that a person will go hand in hand with his or her brain if it was to be transplanted, as the organ would be transported with all its content including mental characteristics. The recipient of the brain will hence believe he is the donor due to the characteristics that would be produced. One can only remember their experiences and hence their memory will reflect their identity.

The psychological approach of personal identity is in relation to my position on Gods existence in that it is in accordance with most religious beliefs. It describes that though people live a bodily life according to their egos they have their mental capacities play a greater role in life. The existence of God as a supernatural being can also be accepted considering the big influence of religion and faith of individuals. People will be influenced by their experiences and memories and at large people’s perception on Gods existence will be influenced by their experiences in life.

PART 3: Free will

Free will is the ability of anyone to make choices without interruption from any factor. Always, choices have consequences and the biggest concern is about is the bringing together the concept of free will and the element of determinism with regard to causal effect approach. Some philosophers have described free will as illusions which affect human actions and behavior. The biggest question is if human beings are able to predict the future will that mean that they are not free? (Bruce, & Barbone, 2011). Generally, determinists are those who deny others freedom,  libertarians are people who think that a free will is free when a choice can be made without considering the consequences and an alternative can be made with the same conditions that pre-exist and compatibilists are people who redefine freedom according to their understanding.

Taking either side will always have its implications. I stand by free will as this encourages personal responsibility to the actions of human beings. Determinism will degrade the freedom that humans enjoy. I support this view due to the fact that human beings always seek freedom wherever they go. Determinism will deny human beings the freedom to choose on their future and thus, free will should be encouraged so that people may take responsibility for their actions other than blaming other factors.

The challenge with my position is that people will always respond to the external and internal factors. People always have choices in life, they have alternatives to make in life but their response and/or behavior will depend on their biological circumstances or the environmental forces governing them. My stand on the free will issue reflects my position on the existence of God in that; everyone has the freedom to choose his or her direction and what they want in life. It will be encouraging when people know the freedoms they enjoy and tolerate one another’s ideas rather than imposing laws and regulations on the actions and the behaviors of each individual.

My stand on personal identity was based on psychological approach this is directly related to the free will stand where one is responsible for their actions. As an individual will be in freedom to perform any actions, their mind including memories and experiences will guide them on any action they should take. In this world, causes have effects and when one is in a situation to make any alternative choice their conscious will lead them to make a specific choice.

Did you know that effective analysis of concepts requires professionalism in handling academic research Papers? Do no compromise on your grade choose professional Research writers at elitetutorslab.com